> If I'm understanding this correctly, you're saying "class Fabric" is > the C++ equivalent of "struct fid_domain" -- is that right?
That is my initial understanding; however, it may be closer to some merger of fid_fabric and fid_domain. Chris called out that the names are subject to change. > If so, that is going to be tremendously confusing. I agree, but fixing the name isn't too hard at this point. Maybe we call it class FabricDomain. Anyway, I'm more concerned at the moment with figuring out if C++ needs separate Fabric and Domain classes, or if we only deal with fid_domains. And if we go with the latter what happens with the fid_pep. I don't quite understand how ASIO deals with connection establishment yet. - Sean _______________________________________________ ofiwg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg
