> Given that "protocol" and "transport" may be overloaded terms, > should we use a field name like "network_type"? That lets us > identify Ethernet, IB, Omnipath, GNI, ... etc. I think that's what > we're trying to identify here, right?
Yes, I was trying to report Ethernet, IB (for actual IB link layer), OmniPath, etc. I have no idea what Cray or BG/Q actually are. Aries? BG/Q? But that's a provider problem. :) _______________________________________________ ofiwg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/mailman/listinfo/ofiwg
