On 23 November 2010 18:08, Denis Kenzior <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/23/2010 10:55 AM, Andrzej Zaborowski wrote: >> As for the clear after delay flag, there's a check for it in >> display_text_cb (line 1248). As far as I can make out the only >> difference is the response sent to the SIM. > > So it has been a long time since those discussions, but it does seem to > me that using a higher timeout in the case of 'wait_for_user' flag seems > like a good idea. Do you remember why we left this out?
No, I don't, I'll send a patch to use the normal timeout instead of short timeout when clearing after user action is requested. As for the proposal to add a parameter clear_after_delay and the ScreenBusy response I'm fine with both of them (as I don't think the saving from hiding these details is worth it) but I leave it up to you and Guillaume. It seems that a user action always clears the message but it may be good to display a "confirm" button anyway. The ScreenBusy response is also possible for other proactive commands so for consistency would need to be added there too. Best regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
