Hi, > The IFX modem we are targetting implements this with two AT commands. > > > Another question that I did ask is to see some sample results from these > > test cases in failure and success case. > > Robertino?
I think you meant except form the log, such as this: ofonod[1342]: Using multiplexer line discipline 29 ofonod[1342]: Master: > ATE0 +CMEE=1\r ofonod[1342]: Master: < ATE0 +CMEE=1\r ofonod[1342]: Master: < \r\nOK\r\n ofonod[1342]: Master: > a...@rtc:rtc_gti_test_verify_32khz()\r ofonod[1342]: Master: < \r\n ofonod[1342]: Master: < Verification passed\r\nOK\r\n ofonod[1342]: Master: > a...@vers:device_version_id()\r ofonod[1342]: Master: < \r\n ofonod[1342]: Master: < \r\nCHIP ID = XG626 ES2\r\nFLASH TYPE = NumonyxM18 NOR\r\nFLASH ID = 0x898881\r\nSmartiUE2 = 37664\r\nRF PMU = 10548\r\nPA PMU = 40244\r\nRF ASM = 0\r\nFEM PA = 21812\r\nOK\r\n Simulated Self test Failure ofonod[1260]: Using multiplexer line discipline 29 ofonod[1260]: Master: > ATE0 +CMEE=1\r ofonod[1260]: Master: < ATE0 +CMEE=1\r ofonod[1260]: Master: < \r\nOK\r\n ofonod[1260]: Master: > a...@rtc:rtc_gti_test_verify_32khz()\r ofonod[1260]: Master: < \r\n ofonod[1260]: Master: < Verification passed\r\nOK\r\n ofonod[1260]: Master: > a...@vers:device_version_id\r ofonod[1260]: Master: < \r\nERROR\r\n ofonod[1260]: Modem Device Version Test: FAIL > In the patch it is the timeout for the first self test command. > I understand you are thinking about a potential future patch in which it > would be > used as the overall setup timeout, I agree that in that case the name should > be > changed accordingly as well, yes. Do you think we should use overall setup timeout? Thanks, -- r. _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
