On Tuesday 11 January 2011 02:39:26 ext Marcel Holtmann, you wrote: > Hi Remi, > > > src/common.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/common.c b/src/common.c > > index 4d93488..d4e567b 100644 > > --- a/src/common.c > > +++ b/src/common.c > > @@ -702,9 +702,9 @@ const char *registration_tech_to_string(int tech) > > > > case ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_GSM_EGPRS: > > return "edge"; > > > > case ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_UTRAN_HSDPA: > > - return "hspa"; > > + return "hsdpa"; > > > > case ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_UTRAN_HSUPA: > > - return "hspa"; > > + return "hsupa"; > > > > case ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_UTRAN_HSDPA_HSUPA: > > return "hspa"; > > > > case ACCESS_TECHNOLOGY_EUTRAN: > what happens here on the CS interface. Will we ever see anything else > than UMTS indication on CS and the extra ones are purely for PS or how > is this expected?
Yeah, that's how I interpret CREG and CGREG. But ultimately, it depends how the modem vendors interpret it, not how I interpret it... > The second question is why do we bother with the difference between > uplink and downlink speed. The user just cares about HSxPA in general > and that is why these three have been combined. I have seen requirements to distinguish them. If you don't care and only want to show 3.5G for all of them, it's still easy to match hs.?pa -- Rémi Denis-Courmont Nokia Devices R&D, Maemo Software, Helsinki _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
