Hi Marcel.
>> +static void get_modems()
>> +{
>
> so these are declared as get_modems(void) btw. The compiler should have
> warned you about this.
I don't get a compiler warning for this one, not even with -Wall
-Wextra -Wpedantic on GCC 4.4.3.
But a new rule in the coding-style should perhaps be added, e.g:
M15: Use void if function has no parameters
====================================
A function with no parameters must use void in the parameter list.
Example:
1)
void foo(void)
{
}
2)
void foo() // Wrong
{
}
...
>> +static void mgr_disconnect(DBusConnection *connection, void *user_data)
>> +{
>> + g_hash_table_remove_all(modem_list);
>> + g_dbus_remove_watch(connection, property_changed_watch);
>> +}
>> +
....
>> +static void stemgr_exit()
>> +{
>> + g_hash_table_destroy(modem_list);
>> + g_dbus_remove_watch(connection, modem_daemon_watch);
>> + g_dbus_remove_watch(connection, property_changed_watch);
>
> This is not right. You need to remove the property_changed_watch in the
> disconnect callback. Otherwise if your daemon restarts twice you
> actually have two watches.
It's already present in mgr_disconnect, did you miss that?
In the previous review 2011/1/5 you said:
> +static void stemgr_exit()
> +{
>The only thing you missed here is to remove the property changed watch
>in case it was registered (aka the init daemon started).
Anyway, I think the watch handing in the latest patch is correct,
we need to do remove_watch for property_changed_watch
in both stemgr_exit and in stemgr_disconnect.
Regards,
Sjur
_______________________________________________
ofono mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono