Hi Gustavo and Denis

On 01/21/2011 12:25 PM, ext Gustavo F. Padovan wrote:
Hi Denis,

* Denis Kenzior<[email protected]>  [2011-01-21 14:15:46 -0600]:

Hi Dara,

On 01/20/2011 04:48 PM, Dara Spieker-Doyle wrote:
Add support for providing the type of the attached modem device
including GSM (3GPP), CDMA (3GPP2) and Bluetooth HFP.
---
  doc/modem-api.txt |   13 +++++++++++++
  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/modem-api.txt b/doc/modem-api.txt
index 45043b0..fe806c8 100644
--- a/doc/modem-api.txt
+++ b/doc/modem-api.txt
@@ -82,6 +82,19 @@ Properties   boolean Powered [readwrite]

                        This is usually obtained by using the +CGSN AT command.

+               string Type [readonly, optional, experimental]
+
+                       String representing the type of the modem device.
+
+                       The possible values are:
+                               "gsm"         Modem supports one or more of the 
3GPP
+                                       family of technologies including GSM,
+                                       EDGE, UMTS, HSPA, LTE.
+                               "cdma"  Modem supports one or more of the 3GPP2
+                                       family of technologies including CDMA 
1x,
+                                       EVDO.
+                               "hfp" Bluetooth hands-free profile (HFP) modem
+

So one pointed question:

How are we planning to support dual-mode devices with this property?  I
believe during the CDMA workshop we decided that the clients should
simply look at the set of interfaces, not a semi-static property...

We can have a value that is "gsm&  cdma". This fits for now, but won't scale.
And this list won't increase in the near future I think.

This is along the lines of my thoughts for future support of a multi-mode device- but I left it out for now as a value as it's future work. Denis - Lei's about to pop in and answer your questions as he was actually at the workshop! :)

Cheers
Dara
_______________________________________________
ofono mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono

Reply via email to