Hi Tomasz, > Shouldn’t ReleaseAndAnswere() release the active call and bring back the > held one in such situation? >
You shouldn't be using ReleaseAndAnswer in this case, instead you should use SwapCalls. SwapCalls has the added benefit of allowing swapping of held and active calls even if there is a call waiting (if your modem hardware supports this.) > > There also could be a little more description of behavior for a case > when we have held and waiting calls saying that the waiting call will be > answered and > that held won’t be released. > The documentation says: "Releases currently active call and answers the currently waiting call". Is this not enough? Can you suggest better wording? Regards, -Denis _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
