Hi, On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 19:58 +0200, Denis Kenzior wrote: > Hi Andrew / Lasse, > > > diff --git a/src/stk.c b/src/stk.c > > index bc46b2f..c4e988b 100644 > > --- a/src/stk.c > > +++ b/src/stk.c > > @@ -2514,6 +2514,7 @@ static void stk_proactive_command_cancel(struct > > ofono_stk *stk) > > stk_command_free(stk->pending_cmd); > > stk->pending_cmd = NULL; > > stk->cancel_cmd = NULL; > > + stk->respond_on_exit = FALSE; > > } > > } > > > > Patch looks good to me, however I'd like it in something I can actually > apply. > Andrew can probably provide a patch for this?
> Lasse, can you confirm this patch solves your issue? Yes, it solves the issue. The null pointer check would be good to have as well, but not mandatory if this is taken in BR, -Lasse > > Regards, > -Denis _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list ofono@ofono.org http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
