Hi Andrew,

ofono-boun...@ofono.org wrote:
> Hi Jeevaka,
> 
> On 7 March 2011 16:35, Jeevaka Badrappan
> <jeevaka.badrap...@elektrobit.com> wrote:
>> ---
>>  src/stkutil.c |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/src/stkutil.c b/src/stkutil.c index abd1c99..66b2924
>> 100644 --- a/src/stkutil.c
>> +++ b/src/stkutil.c
>> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static gboolean parse_dataobj_alpha_id(struct
>> comprehension_tlv_iter *iter,        char *utf8;
>> 
>>        len = comprehension_tlv_iter_get_length(iter); -       if
>> (len == 0) { +       if (len <= 1) {
>>                *alpha_id = g_try_malloc0(1);
> 
> In the description you talk about Length == 00 and no value
> part but this change affects the case of Length == 1, which I
> think we're handling correctly already.  What is the exact problem
> case? 
> 
> I'm not sure but I think we already considered an identical
> patch, but in the spec there's nothing special about this
> case so I think the zero-length string needs to be sent to
> the user like any other string.
> 

Agree, empty string case is already covered. Just confused myself.
Patch can be ignored as this is already covered.

Regards,
Jeevaka
_______________________________________________
ofono mailing list
ofono@ofono.org
http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono

Reply via email to