On 27/06/2011 18:31, Denis Kenzior wrote:
Hi Guillaume,

On 06/27/2011 11:15 AM, Guillaume Zajac wrote:
---
  gatchat/gatppp.c  |   79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
  gatchat/gatppp.h  |    2 +
  gatchat/ppp.h     |    8 +++++
  gatchat/ppp_lcp.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++---
  4 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gatchat/gatppp.c b/gatchat/gatppp.c
index 5fb4146..2640985 100644
--- a/gatchat/gatppp.c
+++ b/gatchat/gatppp.c
@@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ struct _GAtPPP {
        int fd;
        guint guard_timeout_source;
        gboolean suspended;
+       gboolean force_acfc_off;
You don't need this variable, see below for more

+       gboolean acfc;
Please name this xmit_acfc.

  };

  void ppp_debug(GAtPPP *ppp, const char *str)
@@ -168,8 +170,19 @@ static inline gboolean ppp_drop_packet(GAtPPP *ppp, 
guint16 protocol)
  static void ppp_receive(const unsigned char *buf, gsize len, void *data)
  {
        GAtPPP *ppp = data;
-       guint16 protocol = ppp_proto(buf);
-       const guint8 *packet = ppp_info(buf);
+       struct ppp_header *header = (struct ppp_header *) buf;
+       gboolean acfc_frame = (header->address != PPP_ADDR_FIELD
+                       || header->control != PPP_CTRL);
+       guint16 protocol;
+       const guint8 *packet;
+
+       if (acfc_frame) {
+               protocol = ppp_acfc_proto(buf);
+               packet = ppp_acfc_info(buf);
+       } else {
+               protocol = ppp_proto(buf);
+               packet = ppp_info(buf);
+       }

        if (ppp_drop_packet(ppp, protocol))
                return;
@@ -196,17 +209,11 @@ static void ppp_receive(const unsigned char *buf, gsize 
len, void *data)
        };
  }

-/*
- * transmit out through the lower layer interface
- *
- * infolen - length of the information part of the packet
- */
-void ppp_transmit(GAtPPP *ppp, guint8 *packet, guint infolen)
+static void ppp_send_common_frame(GAtPPP *ppp, guint8 *packet, guint infolen,
+                                       gboolean lcp)
Shouldn't this be called send_lcp_frame?

Yes sorry I had an issue with git reflog. I will fix it in next version.

  {
        struct ppp_header *header = (struct ppp_header *) packet;
-       guint16 proto = ppp_proto(packet);
        guint8 code;
-       gboolean lcp = (proto == LCP_PROTOCOL);
        guint32 xmit_accm = 0;
        gboolean sta = FALSE;

@@ -251,6 +258,44 @@ void ppp_transmit(GAtPPP *ppp, guint8 *packet, guint 
infolen)
                g_at_hdlc_set_xmit_accm(ppp->hdlc, xmit_accm);
  }

+static void ppp_send_acfc_frame(GAtPPP *ppp, guint8 *packet,
+                                       guint infolen)
+{
+       struct ppp_header *header = (struct ppp_header *) packet;
+       guint offset = 0;
+
+       if (ppp->acfc)
+               offset = 2;
+       else
+               offset = 0;
+
+       if (g_at_hdlc_send(ppp->hdlc, packet + offset,
+                               infolen + sizeof(*header) - offset)
+                       == FALSE)
+               DBG(ppp, "Failed to send a frame\n");
+}
+
+/*
+ * transmit out through the lower layer interface
+ *
+ * infolen - length of the information part of the packet
+ */
+void ppp_transmit(GAtPPP *ppp, guint8 *packet, guint infolen)
+{
+       guint16 proto = ppp_proto(packet);
+
+       switch (proto) {
+       case LCP_PROTOCOL:
+               ppp_send_common_frame(ppp, packet, infolen, TRUE);
+               break;
+       case CHAP_PROTOCOL:
+       case IPCP_PROTO:
+       case PPP_IP_PROTO:
+               ppp_send_acfc_frame(ppp, packet, infolen);
+               break;
+       }
+}
+
  static inline void ppp_enter_phase(GAtPPP *ppp, enum ppp_phase phase)
  {
        DBG(ppp, "%d", phase);
@@ -390,6 +435,14 @@ void ppp_set_mtu(GAtPPP *ppp, const guint8 *data)
        ppp->mtu = mtu;
  }

+void ppp_set_acfc_enabled(GAtPPP *ppp, gboolean acfc)
Please name this function ppp_set_xmit_acfc(GAtPPP *ppp, gboolean acfc)

+{
+       if (ppp->force_acfc_off)
+               ppp->acfc = FALSE;
+       else
+               ppp->acfc = acfc;
And set ppp->xmit_acfc directly from acfc...

+}
+
  static void io_disconnect(gpointer user_data)
  {
        GAtPPP *ppp = user_data;
@@ -658,6 +711,12 @@ void g_at_ppp_set_server_info(GAtPPP *ppp, const char 
*remote,
        ipcp_set_server_info(ppp->ipcp, r, d1, d2);
  }

+void g_at_ppp_force_acfc_off(GAtPPP *ppp, gboolean off)
Please name this function g_at_ppp_set_acfc_enabled(GAtPPP *ppp,
gboolean enabled)

+{
+       ppp->force_acfc_off = off;
+       lcp_turn_off_acfc(ppp->lcp);
To help in regression testing lets turn off ACFC by default, and only
enable it if someone has asked for it.

+}
+
  static GAtPPP *ppp_init_common(gboolean is_server, guint32 ip)
  {
        GAtPPP *ppp;
diff --git a/gatchat/gatppp.h b/gatchat/gatppp.h
index f0930a7..d0231fc 100644
--- a/gatchat/gatppp.h
+++ b/gatchat/gatppp.h
@@ -79,6 +79,8 @@ void g_at_ppp_set_recording(GAtPPP *ppp, const char 
*filename);
  void g_at_ppp_set_server_info(GAtPPP *ppp, const char *remote_ip,
                                const char *dns1, const char *dns2);

+void g_at_ppp_force_acfc_off(GAtPPP *ppp, gboolean off);
+
  #ifdef __cplusplus
  }
  #endif
diff --git a/gatchat/ppp.h b/gatchat/ppp.h
index 023d779..116b5db 100644
--- a/gatchat/ppp.h
+++ b/gatchat/ppp.h
@@ -85,10 +85,17 @@ static inline void __put_unaligned_short(void *p, guint16 
val)
  #define ppp_proto(packet) \
        (get_host_short(packet + 2))

+#define ppp_acfc_info(packet) \
+       (packet + 2)
+
+#define ppp_acfc_proto(packet) \
+       (get_host_short(packet))
+
  /* LCP related functions */
  struct pppcp_data *lcp_new(GAtPPP *ppp, gboolean dormant);
  void lcp_free(struct pppcp_data *lcp);
  void lcp_protocol_reject(struct pppcp_data *lcp, guint8 *packet, gsize len);
+void lcp_turn_off_acfc(struct pppcp_data *pppcp);

  /* IPCP related functions */
  struct pppcp_data *ipcp_new(GAtPPP *ppp, gboolean is_server, guint32 ip);
@@ -125,4 +132,5 @@ void ppp_lcp_finished_notify(GAtPPP *ppp);
  void ppp_set_recv_accm(GAtPPP *ppp, guint32 accm);
  void ppp_set_xmit_accm(GAtPPP *ppp, guint32 accm);
  void ppp_set_mtu(GAtPPP *ppp, const guint8 *data);
+void ppp_set_acfc_enabled(GAtPPP *ppp, gboolean acfc);
  struct ppp_header *ppp_packet_new(gsize infolen, guint16 protocol);
diff --git a/gatchat/ppp_lcp.c b/gatchat/ppp_lcp.c
index ce9dae2..3814ddf 100644
--- a/gatchat/ppp_lcp.c
+++ b/gatchat/ppp_lcp.c
@@ -58,11 +58,12 @@ enum lcp_options {
        ACFC                    = 8,
  };

-/* Maximum size of all options, we only ever request ACCM and MRU */
-#define MAX_CONFIG_OPTION_SIZE 10
+/* Maximum size of all options, we only ever request ACCM, MRU and ACFC */
+#define MAX_CONFIG_OPTION_SIZE 12

  #define REQ_OPTION_ACCM       0x1
  #define REQ_OPTION_MRU        0x2
+#define REQ_OPTION_ACFC        0x4

  struct lcp_data {
        guint8 options[MAX_CONFIG_OPTION_SIZE];
@@ -100,13 +101,20 @@ static void lcp_generate_config_options(struct lcp_data 
*lcp)
                len += 4;
        }

+       if (lcp->req_options&  REQ_OPTION_ACFC) {
+               lcp->options[len] = ACFC;
+               lcp->options[len + 1] = 2;
+
+               len += 2;
+       }
+
        lcp->options_len = len;
  }

  static void lcp_reset_config_options(struct lcp_data *lcp)
  {
        /* Using the default ACCM */
-
+       lcp->req_options |= REQ_OPTION_ACFC;
        lcp_generate_config_options(lcp);
  }

@@ -286,9 +294,11 @@ static enum rcr_result lcp_rcr(struct pppcp_data *pppcp,
                        break;
                case MAGIC_NUMBER:
                case PFC:
-               case ACFC:
                        /* don't care */
                        break;
+               case ACFC:
+                       ppp_set_acfc_enabled(ppp, TRUE);
You can check whether we turned on ACFC by checking whether ACFC option
is being advertised to the peer.  E.g. lcp->req_options&  REQ_OPTION_ACFC...

Ok I will do it this way.
Then I will add ACFC and PFC options activation into emulator and gsmdial.

Kind regards,
Guillaume
_______________________________________________
ofono mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono

Reply via email to