Hi Ronald,

> ---
>  src/service.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/service.c b/src/service.c
> index 24c89b6..18c11f4 100644
> --- a/src/service.c
> +++ b/src/service.c
> @@ -690,11 +690,48 @@ static DBusMessage *get_messages(DBusConnection *conn,
>       return reply;
>  }
> 
> +static gboolean get_conversation_get_args(DBusMessage *dbus_msg,
> +                             const char **number, unsigned int *count)
> +{
> +     DBusMessageIter top_iter;
> +
> +     if (dbus_message_iter_init(dbus_msg, &top_iter) == FALSE)
> +             return FALSE;
> +
> +     if (dbus_message_iter_get_arg_type(&top_iter) != DBUS_TYPE_STRING)
> +             return FALSE;
> +
> +     dbus_message_iter_get_basic(&top_iter, number);
> +     if (*number[0] == '\0')
> +             return FALSE;
> +
> +     if (valid_number_format(*number) == FALSE)
> +             return FALSE;
> +
> +     if (!dbus_message_iter_next(&top_iter))
> +             return FALSE;
> +
> +     if (dbus_message_iter_get_arg_type(&top_iter) != DBUS_TYPE_UINT32)
> +             return FALSE;
> +
> +     dbus_message_iter_get_basic(&top_iter, count);
> +
> +     return TRUE;
> +}
> +
>  static DBusMessage *get_conversation(DBusConnection *conn,
>                                       DBusMessage *dbus_msg, void *data)
>  {
>       DBusMessage *reply;
>       DBusMessageIter iter, array;
> +     const char *number;
> +     unsigned int count;
> +
> +     if (get_conversation_get_args(dbus_msg, &number, &count) == FALSE) {
> +             mms_debug("Invalid arguments");
> +
> +             return __mms_error_invalid_args(dbus_msg);
> +     }

in this case I don't really see that it is useful to split this into a
separate function. And the debug print is actually useless. Please
remove that one.

> 
>       reply = dbus_message_new_method_return(dbus_msg);
>       if (reply == NULL)

Regards

Marcel


_______________________________________________
ofono mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono

Reply via email to