Hi Denis: On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Denis Kenzior <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Marcel, > > >>> >>> I don't see why not. Both Codec Negotiation and Wide-band speech are >>> labeled optional for HF/AG in Table 3.1. The only note there says: "If Wide >>> Band Speech is supported, Codec Negotiation shall also be supported." >>> However, there is no note vice-versa. So my interpretation is that Codec >>> Negotiation can always be supported. Can we check the test spec? >>> >>> The problem I see is that by the time we register the SDP record, we >>> still do not know for sure whether the audio framework truly supports mSBC. >> >> >> so we want to expose HFP 1.6 and codec negogiation all the time. Even if >> mSBC codec is not available, because PA does not support it or is not >> running. I read the spec the same way that this fully spec compliant. >> >> If at some point in the future this changes, we can deal with that at that >> point. No need to over engineer it at this point. >> > > Exactly, Codec negotiation should always be supported. > . What my last comment was about is that: > > If mSBC is not supported by PA, then it would be nice to not set the > wide-band speech bit in the SDP record to true. However, we do not know > this information in the current set up until too late.
F.Y.I. some results from the test plan generator consistency check: * if wide band speech is Not supported Codec negotiation is excluded * if wide band speech is Supported, mSBC is mandatory Anyway, I will implementing what you are suggesting. We can fix it later if necessary. Regards, Claudio _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ofono.org/listinfo/ofono
