Hi Denis,

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Denis Kenzior <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Mikel,
>
>
> On 05/08/2013 08:59 AM, Mikel Astiz wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I promised Denis I'd send some traces after testing the iPhone 5 and
>> observing some strange states such as two active calls (test 1) or
>> active+dialing state (test 2).
>>
>> I currently don't have a phone to test with but let me reuse some
>> previous logs. In the second log, the AT commands are not visible so
>> I'm hoping to repeat the experiment fairly soon.
>>
>> The first test is probably a bug in oFono while the second one might
>> be the phone's behavior, to be confirmed.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mikel
>>
>> TEST 1:
>>
>> Steps: Two numbers dialer from the phone while 3-way calling not
>> available in network
>> Result: Two active calls in oFono (but phone shows only the first one)
>>
>> ofonod[14366]: < \r\n+CIEV: 3,2\r\n
>> ofonod[14366]: > AT+CLCC\r
>> ofonod[14366]: < \r\n+CLCC: 1,0,2,0,0,"<phone-number-1>",145\r\n
>> ofonod[14366]: < \r\nOK\r\n
>> ofonod[14366]: src/voicecall.c:ofono_voicecall_notify() Got a
>> voicecall event, status: 2, id: 1, number: <phone-number-1>
>> called_number: , called_name
>> ofonod[14366]: src/voicecall.c:ofono_voicecall_notify() Did not find a
>> call with id: 1
>> ofonod[14366]: < \r\n+CIEV: 3,3\r\n
>> ofonod[14366]: src/voicecall.c:ofono_voicecall_notify() Got a
>> voicecall event, status: 3, id: 1, number: <phone-number-1>
>> called_number: , called_name
>> ofonod[14366]: src/voicecall.c:ofono_voicecall_notify() Found call with
>> id: 1
>> ofonod[14366]: < \r\n+CIEV: 5,5\r\n
>> ofonod[14366]: src/network.c:ofono_netreg_strength_notify() strength 100
>> ofonod[14366]: < \r\n+CIEV: 2,1\r\n
>> ofonod[14366]: src/voicecall.c:ofono_voicecall_notify() Got a
>> voicecall event, status: 0, id: 1, number: <phone-number-1>
>> called_number: , called_name
>> ofonod[14366]: src/voicecall.c:ofono_voicecall_notify() Found call with
>> id: 1
>> ofonod[14366]: < \r\n+CIEV: 3,0\r\n
>>
>> (At this point, a second call is dialed from the phone)
>>
>> ofonod[14366]: < \r\n+CIEV: 3,2\r\n
>> ofonod[14366]: > AT+CLCC\r
>> ofonod[14366]: < \r\n+CLCC: 1,0,0,0,0,"<phone-number-1>",145\r\n
>> ofonod[14366]: < \r\n+CLCC: 2,0,2,0,0,"<phone-number-2>",129\r\n
>
>
> So here we have call with index 1 in state 'Active' and call with index 2 in
> state 'Dialing'.  Obviously a bug with the iPhone.

Is this the kind of bug oFono is interested in fixing as IOP issue? Or
is it something acceptable in oFono's API?

Cheers,
Mikel

>
>
>> ofonod[14366]: < \r\nOK\r\n
>> ofonod[14366]: src/voicecall.c:ofono_voicecall_notify() Got a
>> voicecall event, status: 2, id: 2, number: <phone-number-2>
>> called_number: , called_name
>> ofonod[14366]: src/voicecall.c:ofono_voicecall_notify() Did not find a
>> call with id: 2
>> ofonod[14366]: < \r\n+CIEV: 3,0\r\n
>> ofonod[14366]: src/voicecall.c:ofono_voicecall_notify() Got a
>> voicecall event, status: 0, id: 2, number: <phone-number-2>
>> called_number: , called_name
>> ofonod[14366]: src/voicecall.c:ofono_voicecall_notify() Found call with
>> id: 2
>>
>
> Regards,
> -Denis
>
> _______________________________________________
> ofono mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.ofono.org/mailman/listinfo/ofono
_______________________________________________
ofono mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ofono.org/mailman/listinfo/ofono

Reply via email to