On 17/10/18 10:52, Giacinto Cifelli wrote:
+
+static struct ofono_voicecall_driver driver = {
+ .name = "gemaltomodem",
+ .probe = gemalto_voicecall_probe,
+ .remove = gemalto_voicecall_remove,
+ .dial = gemalto_dial,
+ .answer = gemalto_answer,
+ .hangup_all = gemalto_hangup_all,
+ .hangup_active = gemalto_hangup,
+ .hold_all_active = gemalto_hold_all_active,
+ .release_all_held = gemalto_release_all_held,
+ .set_udub = gemalto_set_udub,
+ .release_all_active = gemalto_release_all_active,
+ .release_specific = gemalto_release_specific,
+ .private_chat = gemalto_private_chat,
+ .create_multiparty = gemalto_create_multiparty,
+ .transfer = gemalto_transfer,
+ .deflect = NULL,
+ .swap_without_accept = NULL,
Are other drivers explicit about _not_ providing implementations? I'd
drop these otherwise?
again, it is done so in the original drivers/atmodem/voicecall.c.
I would drop them...
I would like to know why they weren't dropped in atmodem in the first
place, before dropping them.
Either solution is ok for me, I just want some clarification.
Make the declaration 'const' while you're at it.
/Jonas
_______________________________________________
ofono mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ofono.org/mailman/listinfo/ofono
