Hi Giacinto,
On 10/20/2018 11:28 AM, Giacinto Cifelli wrote:
Hi Denis,
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 6:23 PM Denis Kenzior <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Giacinto,
I need to probe with 'AT' once per second the modem and the
application port, one after the other.
It needs to be repeated a few times, because the device might be
booting up, but it could also be that the device is not responding
(because, for example, mapped on the RS232).
Ugh. Doesn't your firmware provide some sort of ready notification?
yes, but what if the modem has already booted up?
But then your query AT command will succeed no?
See how plugins/mbm.c does this with EMRDY for example. If your modem
is completely unresponsive for a certain amount of time then you might
need to send AT\r or something directly via GAtIO/GIOChannel bypassing
GAtChat.
But anyway, you can still accomplish this with
g_at_chat_send/g_timeout_add/g_at_chat_cancel...
I have tried but it doesn't abort the current 'AT' waiting for an answer.
As I said, we don't support AT command aborts. You can't simply start
writing the next AT command to the serial port. There are special rules
for this with weird timings. See V.250 for details. Also many AT
command interpreter implementations simply don't support this at all or
support aborts for a limited subset of commands.
You're doing something extremely specific, so you can either try and
abuse the g_at_chat_set_wakeup_command (which was added specifically for
one extremely insane modem) or do this manually via GAtIO / GIOChannel.
Another use could be to abort a long-running command (eg: SMS sending,
which can take up to 3 minutes), to allow the application to do
something else, eg: emergency call.
This is why they invented the multiplexer. Also note that we don't
implement actual AT command abortions. So it depends on the behavior of
your AT command interpreter whether this works as you think.
I'm not taking this patch as things stand right now.
I don't have a way out without this. Any suggestions?
Implement proper AT command abort logic per V.250? Or work around some
other way.
Regards,
-Denis
_______________________________________________
ofono mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ofono.org/mailman/listinfo/ofono