Hi Giacinto,

On 10/22/2018 10:00 PM, Giacinto Cifelli wrote:
The ofono_lte_default_attach_info now handles also the protocol and the
authentication method, username and password.

Co-authored-by: Martin Baschin <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/atmodem/lte.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/atmodem/lte.c b/drivers/atmodem/lte.c
index c4866623..ae7a815c 100644
--- a/drivers/atmodem/lte.c
+++ b/drivers/atmodem/lte.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
   *  oFono - Open Source Telephony
   *
   *  Copyright (C) 2017  Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ *  Copyright (C) 2018 Gemalto M2M
   *
   *  This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
   *  it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
@@ -44,41 +45,124 @@ struct lte_driver_data {
        GAtChat *chat;
  };
-static void at_lte_set_default_attach_info_cb(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result,
+struct lte_cbd {
+       gint ref_count; /* Ref count */
+       ofono_lte_cb_t cb;
+       void *data;
+       GAtChat *chat;

Why don't you just replace this with struct lte_driver_data * instead;

+       const struct ofono_lte_default_attach_info *info;

And honestly, I'd just put this into lte_driver_data as well.

Nope you can't do this. This is the third time I nak-ed this part

+       struct ofono_modem *modem;

You don't use this member, so leave it out.

+};
+
+static struct lte_cbd *lte_cb_data_new0(void *cb, void *data,
+               GAtChat *chat, const struct ofono_lte_default_attach_info *info)
+{
+       struct lte_cbd *cbd = g_new0(struct lte_cbd, 1);
+
+       cbd->ref_count = 1;
+       cbd->cb = cb;
+       cbd->data = data;
+       cbd->chat = chat;
+       cbd->info = info;
+
+       return cbd;
+}
+
+static inline struct lte_cbd *lte_cb_data_ref(struct lte_cbd *cbd)

Why don't we simply add ref/unref to cb_data.  e.g.

cb_data_ref()
cb_data_unref()

+{
+       if (cbd == NULL)
+               return NULL;
+
+       g_atomic_int_inc(&cbd->ref_count);
+
+       return cbd;
+}
+
+static void lte_cb_data_unref(gpointer user_data)
+{
+       gboolean is_zero;
+       struct lte_cbd *cbd = user_data;
+
+       if (cbd == NULL)
+               return;
+
+       is_zero = g_atomic_int_dec_and_test(&cbd->ref_count);
+
+       if (is_zero == TRUE)
+               g_free(cbd);
+}
+
+static void at_lte_set_auth_cb(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result,
                                                        gpointer user_data)
  {
-       struct cb_data *cbd = user_data;
+       struct lte_cbd *cbd = user_data;
        ofono_lte_cb_t cb = cbd->cb;
        struct ofono_error error;
- DBG("ok %d", ok);
-
        decode_at_error(&error, g_at_result_final_response(result));
        cb(&error, cbd->data);
  }
+static void at_lte_set_default_attach_info_cb(gboolean ok, GAtResult *result,
+                                                       gpointer user_data)
+{
+       struct lte_cbd *cbd = user_data;
+       ofono_lte_cb_t cb = cbd->cb;
+       void *data = cbd->data;
+       struct ofono_error error;
+       char buf[32 + OFONO_GPRS_MAX_USERNAME_LENGTH +
+                                       OFONO_GPRS_MAX_PASSWORD_LENGTH  + 1];
+       size_t buflen = sizeof(buf);
+       size_t len;
+       enum ofono_gprs_auth_method auth_method;
+
+       if (!ok) {
+               lte_cb_data_unref(cbd);

This causes cb_data_unref to be called twice with reference count at 1. E.g. most likely a crash right after you return from this callback.

+               decode_at_error(&error, g_at_result_final_response(result));
+               cb(&error, data);
+               return;
+       }
+
+       auth_method = cbd->info->auth_method;
+
+       /* change the authentication method if the  parameters are invalid */
+       if (!*cbd->info->username || !*cbd->info->password)
+               auth_method = OFONO_GPRS_AUTH_METHOD_NONE;
+
+       len = snprintf(buf, buflen, "AT+CGAUTH=0,%d",
+                       at_util_gprs_auth_method_to_auth_prot(auth_method));
+       buflen -= len;
+
+       if (auth_method != OFONO_GPRS_AUTH_METHOD_NONE)
+               snprintf(buf + len, buflen, ",\"%s\",\"%s\"",
+                               cbd->info->username, cbd->info->password);
+
+       cbd = lte_cb_data_ref(cbd);
+       if (g_at_chat_send(cbd->chat, buf, NULL,
+                       at_lte_set_auth_cb, cbd, lte_cb_data_unref) > 0)
+               return;
+
+       lte_cb_data_unref(cbd);
+       CALLBACK_WITH_FAILURE(cb, data);
+}
+
  static void at_lte_set_default_attach_info(const struct ofono_lte *lte,
                        const struct ofono_lte_default_attach_info *info,
                        ofono_lte_cb_t cb, void *data)
  {
        struct lte_driver_data *ldd = ofono_lte_get_data(lte);
-       char buf[32 + OFONO_GPRS_MAX_APN_LENGTH + 1];
-       struct cb_data *cbd = cb_data_new(cb, data);
-
-       DBG("LTE config with APN: %s", info->apn);
+       struct lte_cbd *cbd = lte_cb_data_new0(cb, data, ldd->chat, info);
+       char *buf = at_util_get_cgdcont_command(0, info->proto, info->apn);

Honestly I'd just do it like:
cbd = cb_data_new(cb, data);
cb->user = ldd;

memcpy(&ldd->pending_username, ...);
memcpy(&ldd->pending_password, ...);
ldd->pending_auth = ...;

-       if (strlen(info->apn) > 0)
-               snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "AT+CGDCONT=0,\"IP\",\"%s\"",
-                               info->apn);
-       else
-               snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "AT+CGDCONT=0,\"IP\"");
-
-       /* We can't do much in case of failure so don't check response. */
        if (g_at_chat_send(ldd->chat, buf, NULL,
-                       at_lte_set_default_attach_info_cb, cbd, g_free) > 0)
-               return;
+                                       at_lte_set_default_attach_info_cb,
+                                       cbd, lte_cb_data_unref) > 0)

cb_data_unref

+               goto end;
+ lte_cb_data_unref(cbd);

g_free/cb_data_unref.

        CALLBACK_WITH_FAILURE(cb, data);
+end:
+       g_free(buf);
  }
static gboolean lte_delayed_register(gpointer user_data)


Regards,
-Denis
_______________________________________________
ofono mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ofono.org/mailman/listinfo/ofono

Reply via email to