Hi, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 8:23 PM Denis Kenzior <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Marcel, > > > > > I think that MBIM (and even QMI) have AT passthrough options. So by all > > means, the main transport suppose to be MBIM here. I always prefer if only > > one hardware port is opened and there is no need to open more. > > I've seen QMI over MBIM some vendor extended service UIDs. Not sure > about AT over MBIM. If someone knows more, feel free to educate me. > > Isn't AT over QMI also possible? And in theory AT over QMI over MBIM, lol. >
AT over MBIM is possible, but we decided not to implement it. The big advantage of MBIM is a ready-made driver on Windows and on MM/ofono. Adding AT over it would mean reworking the driver, so no more advantages. Over QMI I don't know. QMI over MBIM is also possible, but with the same disadvantage as AT over MBIM. > Regards, > -Denis _______________________________________________ ofono mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ofono.org/mailman/listinfo/ofono
