Hi Denis, Den tors 13 feb. 2020 kl 17:44 skrev Denis Kenzior <[email protected]>:
> > > > - if (!g_at_result_iter_next_number(&iter, &state)) > > - return; > > + goto parsed_state; > > Wouldn't it look nicer to just perform the ublox_ureg_state_to_tech > steps here (i.e within the loop) without the goto? > Yes, its a good suggestion! I have sent a v2. --Richard
_______________________________________________ ofono mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
