> + ibal_port_p->link_width_supported = mthca_port_p- >>active_width; > > >Shouldn't this be active width rather than supported width ?
Please see my reply to Leonid. The existing structure does not contain an active_width field. I think the best solution may be to rename this field, which maintains the ABI, but breaks the API. I doubt this would break any applications though. - Sean _______________________________________________ ofw mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw
