Hi Stan, Stan C. Smith wrote on Tue, 13 Oct 2009 at 16:52:42:
> > Let the discussions begin: > > 1) 'static inline' vs/ AL_INLINE ? AL_INLINE allows an inline function to be exported by a DLL so that if the compiler doesn't inline the function, there exists still a valid DLL export for it. Static inline doesn't do the same thing. I suspect that making these functions all static inline would not significantly affect the size of executables. Most binaries don't reference them anyhow. > 2) New ib_port_info_t fields; additional driver mods. > 3) ? Is the goal here to merge the opensm ib_types.h so that opensm can simply reference the one in inc/iba? Or will we continue to have multiple versions of ib_types.h (one private to OpenSM, the other for everyone else?) Thanks, -Fab _______________________________________________ ofw mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw
