>Index: Q:/projMLNX_WinOF_2.0/MLNX_WinOF_2-0/core/al/kernel/al_cm_cep.c
>===================================================================
>--- Q:/projMLNX_WinOF_2.0/MLNX_WinOF_2-0/core/al/kernel/al_cm_cep.c (revision
>4956)
>+++ Q:/projMLNX_WinOF_2.0/MLNX_WinOF_2-0/core/al/kernel/al_cm_cep.c (revision
>4957)
>@@ -2289,7 +2289,15 @@
>    __format_drep( p_cep, NULL, 0, &p_cep->mads.drep );
>    p_cep->state = CEP_STATE_TIMEWAIT;
>    __insert_timewait( p_cep );
>+   break;
>
>+  case CEP_STATE_LAP_SENT:
>+   /*
>+    * Before CEP was sent, we have been in CEP_STATE_ESTABLISHED as we
>+    * failed to send, we return to that state.
>+    */
>+   p_cep->state = CEP_STATE_ESTABLISHED;
>+   break;
>   default:
>    break;
>   }

I think it would be easier to track APM states separately from the CEP state.
The CEP states should match that in the spec (12.9).

_______________________________________________
ofw mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw

Reply via email to