>Please feel free to embellish getopt()...for now I'm concerned with 2.2 release >and will modify this code when getopt() supports multiple switch identifiers >along with the switch '?'.
This is why I think the change should be to getopt instead. There are about 30 executables that are part of the 2.2 release that call getopt. A change there would fix all of those to use the windows '/' option identifier for this release. - Sean _______________________________________________ ofw mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw
