>> This is no different than the IBAL provider, though. > >For the ibal nd provider you are correct. For the normal ibal verbs >this >is not correct. >The good old ibal has managed to do arm without going from user to >kernel.
I think this is misleading. IBAL makes use of separate threads that drop into the kernel as part of its completion/event processing. - Sean _______________________________________________ ofw mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw
