On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Sean Hefty <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The padding looks wrong based on the IB spec. PortInfoRecord should have >>> PortInfo as its last field. The size of PortInfoRecord should be 58 bytes. >> >>I don't think that size for PortInfoRecord is correct as PortInfo is >>60 bytes with MaxCreditHint and LinkRtLatency. > > The IB spec is wrong on table 194 (PortInfoRecord). The PortInfo Length > that's > given is too small.
Right. > I'll submit a bug against this. I already did this. -- Hal > - Sean > > _______________________________________________ ofw mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw
