Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Smith, Stan <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hal Rosenstock wrote: >>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Hal Rosenstock >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Should this patch be pushed to Linux >>>> (opensm/libvendor/osm_vendor_mlx_sa.c) ? >>>> >>> >>> Also, have you compared these two files for other fixes which might >>> be relevant ? >>> >>> -- Hal >> >> Yes. > > So you've picked up the change for setting the num_path component of > path record queries ?
Yes, I believe so. Anywhere num_path is referenced in osm_vendor_ibumad_sa.c there is an equivalent reference in osm_vendor_mlx_sa.c > >> Due to limited visibility I get the impression osm_vendor_mlx_sa.c >> is not used much except for Windows/IBAL. I say this due to the >> missing support for OSMV_QUERY_MULTIPATH_REC queries. >> >> osm_vendor_ibumad* appears to be the mainstay, which is even more >> reason for windows to transition to umad. > > Yes, you're preaching to the choir here... > > -- Hal _______________________________________________ ofw mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw
