I'm going to send FDR patches soon.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Smith, Stan [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 7:38 PM > To: Uri Habusha; Leonid Keller > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: status on FDR support SVN commits? > > Hello Uri, > Please see inline comments. > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Uri Habusha [mailto:[email protected]] > >Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 12:21 PM > >To: Smith, Stan; Leonid Keller > >Cc: [email protected] > >Subject: RE: status on FDR support SVN commits? > > > >Hi Stan, > > > >Leonid already completed the changes for FDR in the low level driver. However > since the bus driver completely changed we need to see > >how we can propagate the changes to OFW svn. > > Leo suggested the FDR patches were a small set and independent of ROCE, hence > could be committed independent of ROCE. > Has something changed? > > > > >Is it okay if we propagate it as part of the changes for RoCE branch? > > Why is it now you choose to ignore the standard open source policy of working > with the OFA-Windows community prior to commits? > > Because you stated ROCE changes were so wide spread that making patches was > too time consuming, the WWG agreed to review a ROCE code drop. > Yes you made a ROCE code drop into gen1\branches and it's nearly impossible > to determine what is old code and what are ROCE patches; many files are > untouched. > No written ROCE insights to be located in the drop. > Your code drop was based on a SVN snapshot taken many months ago....hence the > problem understanding what are ROCE changes and what is old/outdated code. > > Two separate times I have asked Mellanox to clarify the ROCE source drop; no > response. > > At this late date, you are now requesting you dump non-reviewed ROCE code > into SVN, which only just recently it was revealed that the winOFED stack > would not load without your binary-only Ethernet driver. > Has something changed in the mlx4_bus driver such that there no longer a bus > driver dependency on your binary-only Ethernet driver? > > We have asked you two separate times to participate in engineering a solution > which allows the OFED stack to load without your binary only Ethernet driver; > received no input. > > Why is it you choose to ignore OFA-windows community input? > > You behave as if open source participation has no relevance to you. > > > > >By the way do you know if there is any plan to propagate the SM FDR/FDR10 > changes to windows tree. If yes, when it will be done > > Opensm 3.3.11 is in branches\OpenSMX; work-in-progress: configures the fabric > correctly, DAPL and IPoIB tests run correctly, some osmtests pass, MultiCast > tests fail. > Should be completed by the end of the week. > > Stan. > > > >Thanks Uri > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [email protected] [mailto:ofw- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Smith, Stan > >Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 7:13 PM > >To: Leonid Keller > >Cc: [email protected] > >Subject: [ofw] status on FDR support SVN commits? > > > >Hi Leo, > > In the last WWG meeting you stated FDR support could be committed by 9/15. > >What's the estimated time of arrival for those patches to be committed? > > > >Thanks, > > > >Stan. > >_______________________________________________ > >ofw mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw _______________________________________________ ofw mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ofw
