On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Valerie Bubb Fenwick <Valerie.Fenwick at sun.com> wrote: > Hi again - > > here is my feedback on the group management document: > > In the 3rd paragraph, the terminology switches from > talking about Community Groups to "Collectives" why? > > Group Goals at the end of the document make this seem > like a general document, but most of the above text > seems to apply to only Community Groups. Either more > documents are needed, or the above paragraphs need to > become more general (including examples of what you > vote on)
Ouch. This one looks like the old constitution trying to make a comeback. I'm thinking this could almost all go, boiling down to: 1. Groups govern their own affairs. 2. Election of new leaders/affiliates/participants/other roles requires a majority vote of existing leaders. 3. Suspension of leaders/affiliates/participants/other roles requires a consensus vote of existing leaders. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
