SUN (not you Valerie, nor many others on this list, but the general philosophy!!!
A bit less picky bureaucracy please, thank you. Brilliant engineers are wasting their talent, electricity and bandwidth in threads like this one. To the outside it looks ridiculous, plus it leads to nothing. It would have been worthwhile to take only 1/10th of this self-criticism and care behind dictatorship-decisions of 2008 and 2007. But here you are fighting for or against what exactly? The wars are over, Management has won. Now let's concentrate on jointly making the best out of it. But after all important decisions have been - and are being made - by others, let's stop playing pink-red perfect world democracy. Otherwise I do not know if I shall whine or laugh. Have a nice (technical working) day, cheers, %martin On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Valerie Bubb Fenwick <Valerie.Fenwick at sun.com> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Simon Phipps wrote: > >> >> On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:00, Ceri Davies wrote: >> >>> Finally, it looks like I'm ineligible too as I failed to attest to my >>> Statement's accuracy, unless my making the statement counts as an >>> implicit attestation (which it probably doesn't). >> >> While I did take care to make a suitable statement in my announcement >> because I am a cautious type, I think that telling the list is attestation >> enough. Otherwise I'm probably the only valid candidate... > > I don't put things on my blog that I don't believe to be true, > so does that count towards the attestation? ?I'm sure most of us > are in that boat (ie "why would I write it if it wasn't true?") > > Valerie > -- > Valerie Fenwick, http://blogs.sun.com/bubbva > Solaris Security Technologies, ?Developer, Sun Microsystems, Inc. > 17 Network Circle, Menlo Park, CA, 94025. > _______________________________________________ > ogb-discuss mailing list > ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss >
