William Kucharski wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>
>
>> So drop the notion of "Community Supported", and just allow for treating
>> Sun like any other community member.
>> As indicated earlier, the main take away here is that we need resources
>> useful to folks using, or creating, a port that is still in incubation.
>> The source of support, Community or otherwise, shouldn't matter.
>>
>
> Then it actually is quite reasonable to go back to just calling the Community
> the "Porting" community.
>
> Should applications porting issues start driving traffic we could either
> create
> an appropriate project or an Applications Porting community, as appropriate.
>
You forgot what I originally complained about, which was that "Porting"
as a name doesn't clearly indicate what you intended.
When all's said and done, I care less about the name, than I do about
the charter. I still think something indicating "Platforms" or
"Hardware" in the name is better, but whatever....
-- Garrett
>
> William Kucharski
> _______________________________________________
> ogb-discuss mailing list
> ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
>
