On Jul 30, 2008, at 00:08, John Plocher wrote: > The following similarly named roles would be in each group-type > to promote a common culture across all aspects of our community: > > UserGroup: Participant, Leader > Community: Participant, Contributor, Leader > Project: Participant, Contributor, Leader > Electorate: Contributer, Leader (aka OGB Member) > > In general, Participants have a read-only role, the others grant > more and more rights. > > I don't see why User Groups couldn't have Contributors as > well, but am willing to follow Jim's lead as he is the expert.
That works for me. I prefer having sets of names like that than having them different in each entity. I suggest there is a role for "contributor" there, being the set of people with the ability to upload presentations and agendas to the web site. S.
