Glynn Foster wrote: > > Rich Teer wrote: >> On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Derek Cicero wrote: >> >>>> I was wondering if we'd leave that as historical record or just move it to >>>> a historical section under the OGB community. >>> Any final thoughts on this? Delete and redirect or archive? >> I'd be inclined to keep the CAB stuff available, for posterities sake, >> with a note that the OGB is now the correct place to look for current >> info. > > I'd prefer for the information to stay with the old 'CAB' community, with a > historical section detailing the rough history of the CAB, and where the > previous pages are. It would be less cluttered for the new OGB pages, but I'd > obviously worry that most people are aware of the CAB pages and wouldn't think > to look at the OGB pages.
A big honkin' orange box at the top which said something to the effect of "CAB is dead. Long live the OGB." or something to that effect should suffice. -steve (bonus points if you work in the Highlander quote, "There can be only one") -- stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net opensolaris // solaris kernel development
