I thought they said April/August on the call too, so I was also confused.
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
Stephen Lau wrote:
> Thanks Rachna & Valerie for the corrections... sorry, don't know how I
> got July/Oct transposed into Apr/Aug... my mistake.
>
> Guess I have an off-by-2-or-3 bug in my brain.
>
> cheers,
> steve
>
> Valerie Anne Bubb wrote:
>> Thanks, Steve, for collecting all of this!
>>
>> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Stephen Lau wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Fields discussed as not being appropriate for publication were:
>>> Evaluation, & Comments - both fields tend to contain confidential
>>> or proprietary information. There was some discussion that we have
>>> had a notice that Evaluation should not contain confidential
>>> information for years now - and that we should work on opening this
>>> field (either through the use of explicitly tagging a bug as
>>> Evaluation-publishable via a keyword, or doing a product/cat
>>> filter). But in the interest of making the next Bugster release (in
>>> April), Evaluation will be pushed back and revisted for the next
>>> quarterly release (August).
>>
>> I don't think we were targeting the April release - I believe that's
>> scheduled
>> for the next week or so, which will not be enough time to follow up on
>> some AIs, design, code & test. This is being targeted to the August
>> release, IIRC.
>>
>> I know there were core issues that still needed to be investigated by
>> the core
>> team, such as: what level could we filter on (ie could we just do this
>> by product
>> level, or could we do more fine grained & exclude specific categories
>> or subcategories).
>>
>> Hopefully that won't take long & they'll have a design shortly to run
>> by tools-discuss.
>> (that's the alias the Bugster team is on, so they probably won't even
>> see these
>> notes)
>>
>> Valerie
>
>
