Simon Phipps wrote On 04/27/07 10:59,:
> 
> On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:57, Stephen Lau wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:48:24PM +0900, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, cool. So, for naming, what would you suggest? Do you want them  all
>>> listed on the projects page under their abbreviations or their full
>>> names? And should they mix in with everything else under whatever  their
>>> first name is alphabetically or be grouped together under "UG  [name]"?
>>>
>>> So,
>>>
>>> UG Argentina OpenSolaris User Group AOSUG
>>> UG Atlanta OpenSolaris User Group ATLOSUG
>>> UG Silicon Valley OpenSolaris User Group SVOSUG
>>> ... (50) or so more ...
>>>
>>> Something like that? By putting "UG" in front, they should all be  
>>> listed
>>> in one block on the projects page just like they are on the  discussions
>>> page http://opensolaris.org/os/discussions/. Otherwise, they'll be
>>> spread out among all the other projects.
>>
>>
>> Right, I'd prefer they be displayed together; ideally, the user groups
>> would be on their own page so we can more easily separate them -  but the
>> current webapp implementation doesn't make that possible  unfortunately.
>>
>> Prefixing with "UG" will solve the display problem, yeah - though it's
>> kind of a hack.  I suppose we could do that for now until at some  point
>> in the future we get better webapp support for doing a better  solution.
> 
> 
> One thing I suggested in the user groups list was to gather groups by  
> language, so that non-English speakers would find a batch of mailing  
> lists where they felt comfortable participating even if they weren't  
> geographically related. This complicates matters as at present we do  
> not have a hierarchical system for projects-within-projects. One  
> solution would be to prefix UG-xx  where xx is the language code; thus
> 
> UG-EN UK - London LOSUG
> UG-EN USA - Denver FROSUG
> UG-ES Argentina AOSUG
> UG-ES Spain
> UG-FR France - Paris
> UG-PT Brasil - Sao Paulo
> UG-PT Brasil - Brasilia
> UG-PT Portugal
> 
> and so on. A better solution would be to fix the webapp though :-)
> 
> S.


yah, good idea, I like it. And others liked it, too. The UG lists are 
starting to get quite diverse now, so this makes sense.

Jim
-- 
Jim Grisanzio http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris


Reply via email to