Thanks Valerie,

My comments inline.

Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote:
> Hi gang -
> 
> here is my feedback on the Group Lifecycle Administrative Proceedures
> document.
> 
> I am a bit confused, as this document seems to cover project lifecycle,
> but then we also have a project instantiation document (or was that
> project instantiation doc the one that was for the old constitution?
> if so, it may help to remove it from the list)

Nevermind the instantiation document, the feedback was too late for me 
to incorporate.

> 
> Step #4 in creation process seems like it could be a black hole. A simple:
> "Wait" seems like something that may never happen, unlike our current
> process where ogb-discuss is notified when something like this is ready
> and the project creation alias.

I think bug management should be expected, so I don't see this as a 
black hole at all, at least it is less of a black hole than sending mail 
to a list which is the current process.

> 
> The creation process (step #3) is in conflict with the Group Management
> document that requires 3 votes for the creation, and here just
> requires one (besides yourself).

Got it, this is fixed.

-Michelle
> 
> These two policies overlap in their nature and need to be consistent.
> 
> Valerie


Reply via email to