On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Simon Phipps <Simon.Phipps at sun.com>
> wrote:
>> Hey, enough. I don't care who is to blame just now, we can whip the guilty
>> later.
>>
>> I move that the base number used to calculate the quorum for the actual
>> ballots shall be the number of people capable of legitimately voting on the
>> day the ballot opens, regardless of potential eligibility.
>>
>> Do I have a second?
>
> Are you proposing we violate section 5.8 of the constitution and overturn a
> previous OGB decision and the messaging we've done to Members thus far?
> The constitution specifies how and when we do this, and messaging has been
> pretty consistent.
You're right, Peter. I wasn't thinking of it like that.
I obviously need to think more on this. The arguments about simply fixing
account problems is a good one, and I think we actually might have something
in the middle.
For example, if I scew up my login 3 times and need my account fixed,
as I was authenticated before, I think my account shuold be fixed.
if, on the other hand, I had missed the dozens of emails (personal and to
lists) begging me to authenticate my account and still didn't, then maybe
too bad.
Valerie
--
Sponsor me in the Breathe Easy Ride - 100 miles - June 26!
Money raised goes to the American Lung Association:
http://action.lungusa.org/goto/valerie
