On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Valerie Bubb Fenwick <Valerie.Fenwick at sun.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Jim Walker wrote: > >> Simon Phipps wrote: >>> >>> I propose we set the OGB meeting length to 90 minutes. >> >> +1 > > So, that's four of us. does that not work for anyone else?
It works pretty well for me. (That's as a hard limit, and if we could commit to getting through the primary business section inside the hour - should be possible given that much of that business is rubber-stamping - then we get through all the formal business, allow time for extended discussion later, and allow anyone who has to dash to do so.) -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
