On Apr 17, 2009, at 01:02, Shawn Walker wrote: > Peter Tribble wrote: >> I agree with Simon. We need to decide the *what* and the *how* >> ASAP. Are >> the above questions sufficiently well-formed to create an agenda >> item we can >> all vote on? > > As a community member, I think you'd get more votes and traction if: > > 1) the charter was changed first (which you need to do technically > for some of the proposed constitutional changes)
While I think we can change the constitution draft to not need it (and could have done before if the concerns involved had been raised before the deadline), I'd like to do this to make the open source commitment by Sun clear. > 2) voting was web-based (https, just uses the opensolaris login) and > didn't require ssh sessions (seriously, this is beyond mere > mortals). While retaining the ssh option for those that prefer it. > I'd even volunteer to write the web version. +1. I had multiple complaints about this. In particular it discriminates against the advocacy CCs. > 3) that some of the issues surrounding the intent of the community > and its development were clarified Can you be more specific? My intent as an OGB member was simply to make the constitution fit the direction the community was taking, and to eliminate language that was redundant and/or opaque. S.
