+1

I do think that this *feature* should be removed. If anything, CG's should just 
list projects that are related. Good example is how NPIV is related to 
containers, xen, and ldoms.

Speaking of CG's, I think the way things are organized is a little confusing. I 
know there was some talk for example of having the virtualization components 
(containers, ldoms, xen, qemu, etc.) under a single virtualization CG. It might 
make more sense to have *topic* categories that the CG's are organized under. 
What do you think?
 
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Octave J. Orgeron
Solaris Systems Engineer
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/sysadmin/
http://unixconsole.blogspot.com
unixconsole at yahoo.com
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

----- Original Message ----
From: Ben Rockwood <b...@cuddletech.com>
To: OpenSolaris Governing Board Discussions <ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 12:18:01 AM
Subject: [ogb-discuss] Projects


As 
I 
continue 
to 
review 
our 
framework, 
I 
am 
increasingly 
distressed 
by 
the 
misuse 
and 
mishandling 
of 
Projects. 

The 
first 
order 
of 
business 
in 
this 
regard 
is 
to 
completely 
do 
away 
with 
the 
idea 
of 
Project 
Endorsements.  
As 
described 
(loosely) 
by 
the 
Constitution, 
work 
should 
be 
occurring 
in 
Projects 
which 
are 
governed 
by 
a 
CG.  
Projects 
should 
be 
very 
lightweight, 
and 
I 
believe 
that 
they 
are, 
being 
initiated 
at 
the 
sole 
discression 
of 
a 
CG 
Core 
Contrib 
decision, 
provided 
a 
repository 
(SVN 
or 
Hg 
today) 
for 
work, 
and 
allowing 
a 
sandbox 
for 
development 
to 
occur. 

Currently 
Projects 
aren't 
explicitly 
owned 
by 
anyone, 
they 
can 
be 
endorsed 
by 
any 
group 
that 
wishes 
to 
do 
so, 
which 
is 
as 
meaningless 
as 
"Affiliating" 
with 
a 
CG.  
I 
think 
its 
of 
interest 
to 
know 
what 
projects 
a 
CG 
is 
interested 
in, 
but 
it 
does 
not 
denote 
ownership.

Projects 
should, 
and 
must, 
be 
explicitly 
owned 
by 
a 
singular 
CG.  
Currently 
that 
ownership 
is 
simply, 
at 
best, 
implied.



I'd 
like 
to 
gather 
some 
opinions 
on 
the 
matter 
before 
I 
put 
forth 
a 
formal 
motion.

benr.
_______________________________________________
ogb-discuss 
mailing 
list
ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss





      
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

Reply via email to