On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 01:20:20PM -0800, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:

> Updated text based on discussion and input in our meeting:

Just as a follow-up:

The text I just posted was based on a large number of suggestions from
many people heard at today's meeting.  I'm not sure if Glynn's notes
will include everything said during the meeting, so this reflects a
written record of what we were working on.  If I've made any errors
here or misrepresented what anyone was saying or asking for, please
correct them!

This text is *UNDER CONSIDERATION* by the OGB as a possible position
for the board.  It has not been adopted by the OGB, nor does it
necessarily reflect any board member's position.

> Resolved, that the OGB make certain public statements and requests
> concerning Project Indiana and distribution nomenclature.  This act
> may be referenced as "OGB/2007/004 Trademark Usage and Distribution
> Nomenclature".
> 
> The specific statements and requests shall be:
> 
> The OGB notes Sun's and the Indiana Project Team's recent
> announcement[0] that a preview release of their distribution is now
> available as the 'OpenSolaris Developer Preview'.  Unfortunately, this
> choice of nomenclature implies that this prototype has been endorsed
> by the OpenSolaris Community as the exclusive expression of our values
> and intent.  Neither the community's Members nor the OGB have given
> such an endorsement.
> 
> On behalf of the OpenSolaris Community, the OGB has therefore
> determined that this choice of nomenclature is not appropriate at this
> time.  We share Sun's commitment to the timely adoption and execution of a
> fair and flexible policy governing use of the OpenSolaris trademark once
> consensus has been achieved on that policy's desired terms.  We are
> aware and supportive of the ongoing effort to achieve that
> consensus[1] and will rely on its results when negotiating the final
> agreement with Sun.  
> 
> Until that time, we ask that the OpenSolaris Community and Sun 
> discontinue referring to any distribution in a way that implies
> exclusive endorsement of the OpenSolaris Community.  Project Teams
> are asked instead to use terms such as "a distribution of OpenSolaris
> technology" or "a candidate OpenSolaris distribution".  We recognise the
> commendable work done by distribution project teams and look forward 
> to further constructive engagement with them to move forward on a policy
> reflecting our shared values.
> 
> [0] 
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2007-October/035322.html
> 
> [1] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/branding/

-- 
Keith M Wesolowski              "Sir, we're surrounded!" 
FishWorks                       "Excellent; we can attack in any direction!" 

Reply via email to