Simon Phipps wrote: > The proposal below looks good to me, especially since it also answers > Roy's very reasonable issues with the proposed OGB Committee. I suggest > the Content project also be endorsed by Advocacy since there is a clear > functional relationship.
Mike Kupfer wrote: > Would it work to have a Content project that is overseen by multiple > Community Groups? Which seems eminently sensible to me. Perhaps the initial Project membership should be drawn from members of bot the existing Website Project and the Advocacy Community Group? JimG also pointed out to me that the Documentation CG already has a Content project [1], so there is a name clash if not also a scope clash. The main aim of the existing Content project seems to be to produce content for both 'external' articles and the website. I'm not sure that this is the same as my proposed Content project - the existing Content project seems focused on providing material, my proposed project is more to do with the management of any such content. Perhaps I should rename my proposed "Content" project to "Editorial"? [1] http://opensolaris.org/os/project/content/ -- Alan Burlison --
