Casper.Dik at sun.com wrote: >>> Yes, that seems to be to cumbersome; I would prefer OGB not to be >>> involved in project creations as long as projects are started under >>> the wings of a community and the community is not disfunctional >> In that case (if my reading of the OGB minutes is correct) Roland's ksh >> project would never have got off the ground. >> >> I don't understand why a community is necessary for a project to exist, >> sorry. > > You're interpreting my words incorrectly.
Apologies :-) > For those communities which are functioning, it seems strange to require > their projects to be approved somehow. Agreed, but OGB/2007/001 quite clearly states that a project can only exist if it is sponsored by a Community, and that any projects which lose the sponsorship of a Community must cease to exist. > But something will have to create "non-community-endorsed" projects; > are we just talking about those? Yes. -- Alan Burlison --
