On Thu, 31 May 2007, Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:50:07AM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote: > >> Twice this month, for the creation of new projects, I posted >> the following: >> >> "Also copying OGB... FYI, we're moving ahead with with the setup of this >> project under the old process. The 2-business-day discussion period has >> been satisfied, it has sponsorship of the [sponsoring community] and >> has been seconded." >> >> Your and the other members' non-response contributed (really >> badly, IMO) to the confusion. > > What response should we have made?
That's easy. "Eric, All -- The old process is being used as if the OGB has not put the new process in force. Please see (etc). As far as I'm concerned, the OGB _has_ put the new process in force. -Keith"
