Mark Martin wrote: > The resources that "Sun provides the community" as in the charter are > arguably serving the community needs less and less as time progresses. > The "community" is *clearly* not a stakeholder in determining the > changes that the website team provides.
I'm sorry, but that just isn't true. The whole process of selecting xwiki, etc. was very open. I saw no significant pushback (as a whole) over the HTML issues and so on. Even then, things around here are largely a meritocracy. If you do the work, you get to make the rules a lot of the time. Ultimately, if HTML support was such a big issue, then more people should have brought it up a long time ago. Cheers, -- Shawn Walker
