On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 10:00:16AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > 1) Tracking changes to the goverance documents > > We should fix this, whether it be simply setting up a OGB documents > project to store the official copies in a Hg repository or putting > them in a real wiki, like genunix's.
True. But we also have a rigorous process for approving changes; we seem to be better off from a process perspective than OpenDS was. The sheer number of authorized changes made to their equivalent of our constitution suggests that their process was inadequate. Our risk centers around silent, unauthorized change. Theirs appears to have come from inadequate process for approving change. -- Keith M Wesolowski "Sir, we're surrounded!" FishWorks "Excellent; we can attack in any direction!"
