* Richard Lowe <richlowe at richlowe.net> [2007-12-12 23:26]: > Stephen Hahn <sch at sun.com> writes: > > > * Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at Sun.COM> [2007-12-12 22:56]: > >> >From a quick scan of the webpages for those communities, it seems all but > >> >one > >> are meeting the other prime requirement - that of having a public > >> discussion > >> forum. The sole exception is the OS/Net community, which will need to > >> set up > >> a forum ASAP in order to have a place to discuss any further Core > >> Contributor > >> grants for it. > > > > I want to confirm that, since most ON general technical discussion is > > taking place on opensolaris-code, opensolaris-code is seen as *not* > > meeting the requirement of a CG's public forum (so I can help the Core > > Contributors of ON meet this requirement). Right? > > opensolaris-code isn't ON-specific, or associated with any community. A review of the threads shows easily 80+% are concerned with ON-related issues. I am asking only to avoid causing that functioning list from being fragmented.
> To hold by whatever else, they also need a list for their core > contributors to be making decisions on, and for that to be actually > used. Such a list can be added--using -dev or -private. In any case, feedback noted. I'll start contacting ON CCs directly. - Stephen -- sch at sun.com http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
