On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:44 PM, John Beck <john.beck at sun.com> wrote: > JohnP> Just waiting for JBeck to chime in on this thread... > > I don't want to cause a fuss, but I do not agree with the proposal as written. > > Instead of "the electorate is 377, but we'll retroactively increase it if > needed", I think a more accurate statement is "the electorate is 428". ?In > the end, the 51 people whose accounts had gone inactive (some of which have > since been reactivated) will still be franchised, and nobody will be able > to accuse us (fairly or not) of playing games with the numbers.
I'm happier as well with this wording - thanks JBeck! -John
