I agree.

Also, I would like to add the following text so we don't
create a call generator.

---

Furthermore, Core Contributors that did not authenticate
by the Record Date can vote in the election after they
have authenticated their account.

---

I plan to send this out to the core-contrib alias in
an hour or so.

Cheers,
Jim

Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote:
> Hi Jim -
> 
> I think we have a decision on this. The vote was:
> Valerie, Jbeck, Peter in favor.
> Jim against
> Michelle, Plocher: abstain
> 
> So, regardless of how Simon votes, the "ayes" have it.
> (someone correct me if I've got this wrong, but we
> have a voting "quorum" of OGB members: 4 people voted,
> and the decision is clearly for)
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Valerie
> 
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Jim Walker wrote:
> 
>> I propose we adopt the following 2010 Record Date Notice.
>>
>> I vote no (but recommend yes).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jim
>>
>> +++
>>
>> Per the OpenSolaris Constitution[1], The OGB fixed February 14,
>> 2010 as the Record Date for the 2010 annual election. The Record
>> Date is used to determine who is entitled to vote in the election
>> and the majority and quorum numbers needed to pass ballot measures
>> and conclude the Members Meeting respectively. This is detailed in
>> Article V. Sections 5.7 through 5.9 of the Constitution. The
>> following statement gives the 2010 OpenSolaris Electorate, Majority
>> and Quorum numbers.
>>
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> The 2010 OpenSolaris Record Date is February 14, 2010.
>>
>> Electorate: 428  Majority: 215  Quorum: 143
>>
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> 2009-2010 OGB
>>
>> [1] http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+ogb/governance
>> _______________________________________________
>> ogb-discuss mailing list
>> ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
>>
> 

Reply via email to