On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersm...@oracle.com> wrote: > As pointed out in bug 15556 [1], the instructions for creating new > groups under the new constitution [2] refer to bug categories that > are not yet created in bugzilla. Will someone be setting these up soon? > > [1] http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=15556 > [2] > http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+ogb/OGB+Group+Lifecycle+Administrative+Procedures
Good point. (I think some of us were hoping that the bit that says "While this process currently uses Bugzilla as an issue tracking mechanism, the OGB is eager to modify it when a better workflow solution becomes available to the OpenSolaris community" would result in a better workflow solution being available before someone actually tried to create a group. Clearly we've been caught short on that one!) To be honest, the category chosen for that bug seems a good one; we could rewrite the process document just to point to that and see how the bugzilla workflow works. (The whole point of the process documents, of course, is to allow us to make these sorts of changes without having to make everyone vote on a new constitution.) I would like Jim Grisanzio's view on whether we stick with that one current bug category or whether it's worth creating the whole set at this point. (If we stick with one, we just need to write the process so it's clear which process you want.) -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ ogb-discuss mailing list ogb-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
