On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Dennis Clarke <dcla...@blastwave.org> wrote:
>
>> Dennis, I understand your position.  Its not a new one.  Keith and I
>> reached the same conclusion during the transition from CAB to OGB.
>
> I have always acted in ways that benefit the community. At the very least,
> try to do the right thing. Look foolish, fall over, make mistakes, but try
> and then get up and try again.



Dennis Clarke, if memory serves, then  ...  it serves.
Quick reminder:


Back then in November you had shrugged off all community-skepticism
concerning so called Project I(A)Ndiana:

http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/indiana-discuss/2007-November/author.html#Dennis%20Clarke


[indiana-discuss] My VOTE
Dennis Clarke dclarke at blastwave.org
Fri Nov 2 11:48:50 PDT 2007
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/indiana-discuss/2007-November/002459.html


You even published unmodified Sun-written Ad´s on your site:
http://www.blastwave.org/articles/BLS-0061/index.html




Sorry, but I cannot forget many things that happened here.




cheri
%martin bochnig


>> HOWEVER, I have never believed we should simply throw our hands up in
>> the air and roll over to die.  My track-record has been clear: I would
>> gladly reach out in vain and look rediculous doing so than standing by
>> idle and doing nothing.  Frankly the OGB to date has been a useless body
>> that (due to some of its members) have actively opposed any action on
>> the part of the community and pushed back on any pressure applied to the
>> OGB Facilitator.
>
> No debate from me.
>
>> Back to the point.... OpenSolaris is a product of the Indiana, IPS,
>> Distro, ON and other communities.  The folks who are involved in closing
>> the releases (Dr. Hahn, David Comay, and David Miner chiefly) are here
>> in CG's.  If the OpenSolaris project truly has absolutely no
>> communication with those CG's then lets know that now.
>
> I think that they all work for Oracle now. They are bound by agreements to
> Oracle Corporation. We have no reason to expect to hear from them at all
> unless they are given the green light.
>
>> Oracle may not be talking, but they are watching!  We must act!  If
>> Oracle does kill portions of the already bloodied OpenSolaris project
>> they will support that decision by pointing to a community that didn't
>> care, or participate, or reach out.
>>
>> You know a body is dead when it stops moving.... we can't stop moving.
>> The delays in OpenSolaris 2010.03 are a sufficient reason to twitch.
>
> I started twitching weeks ago. I see a snv_137 has landed but no distro
> based on it. Really, we as a community should be rolling our own by now
> regardless.
>
> --
> Dennis Clarke
> dcla...@opensolaris.ca  <- Email related to the open source Solaris
> dcla...@blastwave.org   <- Email related to open source for Solaris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ogb-discuss mailing list
> ogb-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
ogb-discuss mailing list
ogb-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss

Reply via email to